Zenobia Sethna
There are significant negative effects of money laundering on economies, including undermining domestic capital formation, depressed growth, and diverting capital away from development. Strict global regulations such as USA Patriot Act, KYC norms, among others, require financial services organizations to implement money laundering programs to prevent and detect illegal activity. And while some have become more vigilant, the roster of big name banks that have been caught red handed in money laundering scandals in recent years, and consequently fined heavily, continues to defy logic.
HSBC: The bank was fined 1.9 billion USD in 2012 of failing to monitor more than 670 billion USD in wire transfers and over 9.4 USD billion in purchases of U.S. currency from HSBC Mexico, allowing for money laundering by drug cartels. The bank also violated US economic sanctions against Iran, Libya, Sudan, Burma and Cuba. The bank was also fined 43 million USD in 2015 to settle a Money Laundering settlement at its Swiss private bank
Bank of New York : In what came to be known as the Benex Scandal, Bank of New York laundered an estimated 7-9 billion USD when suspected links to the Russian ‘mafia’ deposited into “Benex Worldwide” accounts at the Bank of New York between 1996 and 2002. This money was then transferred to the accounts of several companies across Europe.
Standard Chartered : Fined 300 million USD in 2014 over lapses in its anti-money-laundering procedures. The bank was earlier penalized in 2012 for 340 million USD after it was accused of scheming with Iran to hide from US authorities billions of pounds worth of transactions.
BNP Paribas : Fined 8.9 billion USD in 2014 for concealing billions of dollars in transactions for clients in Sudan, Iran and Cuba in violation of U.S. sanctions. The penalty also included a year-long suspension of the bank’s ability to convert foreign currency into US dollars through its New York office. BNP used a network of banks in the Middle East, Europe and Africa to mask dollar-based transfers linked to Sudanese companies. Employees also got rid of information from wire transfers that could have exposed the identity of blacklisted countries.
Credit Suisse : Pleaded guilty to criminal conspiracy charges in 2014 for, among other things, “assisting clients in using sham entities to hide undeclared accounts” and paid $2.8 billion to settle. Notably, this is one of the very rare instances in recent years when regulators have been able to extract a guilty plea from a financial giant.
Most recently, the leak of 11.5 million documents from the Panama law firm Mossack Fonseca, which helps clients hide financial assets, revealed that Swiss giant UBS created 1,100 offshore companies. Other big banks doing business with Mossack Fonseca included Société Générale (979 companies), the Royal Bank of Canada (378), Commerzbank (92), and Credit Suisse (1,105). While the global fight against offshore tax evasion and money laundering has strengthened in recent years, the system adapts cunningly, shifting money to what are at any given time the weakest links in the financial system.
There are significant negative effects of money laundering on economies, including undermining domestic capital formation, depressed growth, and diverting capital away from development. Strict global regulations such as USA Patriot Act, KYC norms, among others, require financial services organizations to implement money laundering programs to prevent and detect illegal activity. And while some have become more vigilant, the roster of big name banks that have been caught red handed in money laundering scandals in recent years, and consequently fined heavily, continues to defy logic.
HSBC: The bank was fined 1.9 billion USD in 2012 of failing to monitor more than 670 billion USD in wire transfers and over 9.4 USD billion in purchases of U.S. currency from HSBC Mexico, allowing for money laundering by drug cartels. The bank also violated US economic sanctions against Iran, Libya, Sudan, Burma and Cuba. The bank was also fined 43 million USD in 2015 to settle a Money Laundering settlement at its Swiss private bank
Bank of New York : In what came to be known as the Benex Scandal, Bank of New York laundered an estimated 7-9 billion USD when suspected links to the Russian ‘mafia’ deposited into “Benex Worldwide” accounts at the Bank of New York between 1996 and 2002. This money was then transferred to the accounts of several companies across Europe.
Standard Chartered : Fined 300 million USD in 2014 over lapses in its anti-money-laundering procedures. The bank was earlier penalized in 2012 for 340 million USD after it was accused of scheming with Iran to hide from US authorities billions of pounds worth of transactions.
BNP Paribas : Fined 8.9 billion USD in 2014 for concealing billions of dollars in transactions for clients in Sudan, Iran and Cuba in violation of U.S. sanctions. The penalty also included a year-long suspension of the bank’s ability to convert foreign currency into US dollars through its New York office. BNP used a network of banks in the Middle East, Europe and Africa to mask dollar-based transfers linked to Sudanese companies. Employees also got rid of information from wire transfers that could have exposed the identity of blacklisted countries.
Credit Suisse : Pleaded guilty to criminal conspiracy charges in 2014 for, among other things, “assisting clients in using sham entities to hide undeclared accounts” and paid $2.8 billion to settle. Notably, this is one of the very rare instances in recent years when regulators have been able to extract a guilty plea from a financial giant.
Most recently, the leak of 11.5 million documents from the Panama law firm Mossack Fonseca, which helps clients hide financial assets, revealed that Swiss giant UBS created 1,100 offshore companies. Other big banks doing business with Mossack Fonseca included Société Générale (979 companies), the Royal Bank of Canada (378), Commerzbank (92), and Credit Suisse (1,105). While the global fight against offshore tax evasion and money laundering has strengthened in recent years, the system adapts cunningly, shifting money to what are at any given time the weakest links in the financial system.
No comments:
Post a Comment